Startups on WIND are rated and reviewed by Researchers in the WIND community. These Researchers are continuously monitored on their abilities to successfully rate and review Startups. Research tasks to rate and review startups are allocated to Researchers using a sophisticated task matching algorithm that looks at their TrustyScores and potential for completing Research tasks successfully. There are a few core categories that the Researchers evaluate, some of which are common to all Startups and others are context specific, for example "Tokenomics".
WindProtocol includes a weighted average rating across multiple categories. Each of the rating categories are discussed below.
How do you rate the team relative to other projects on our platform? Do they have the right experience and skillset for the project to be a success?
How do you rate the vision of the project relative to other projects on our platform? Is there a strong commercial need for this product to exist and do you think there will be a high user demand for it?
How do you rate the tokenomics of the project relative to other projects on the WIND platform? Is the token likely to appreciate in value?
How do you rate the quality of the marketing of the project relative to other projects on our platform? Is there already significant traction and hype amongst the relevant userbase?
How do you rate the the product from a product and usability perspective relative to other projects on our platform? Is the product intuitive to use? Is the product design visually appealing?
Average Community Score
The community score is an average score across all community ratings. These scores are weighted according to the researcher's TrustScore.